ABSTRACT
Introduction: One in five pregnant women in the UKis obese. Obesity is associated with increased risk of both maternal and foetal adverse outcomes. RCOG guidelines [1] recommend that all women with a booking BMI over 40 kg/m2 should be reviewed antenatally by a senior obstetric anaesthetist to guide risk assessment, medical optimisation and shared decision-making. The 2021 MBRRACE report [2] recommends that all women should be reweighed in the third trimester for accurate VTE risk scoring and prophylactic LMWH dosing. In our institution, reconfiguration of hospital areas as part of the COVID-19 response led to loss of designated clinic space for our obstetric anaesthetic clinic. As a result, our practice since has been to initially offer a telephone consultation followed by a face-to-face review if needed. Finding space for the latter has often been a significant logistical challenge. Our project sought to assess whether our practice continued to meet national standards in the wake of these changes. Method(s): Following audit approval, we retrospectively reviewed all women with a BMI >40 kg/m2 undergoing caesarean section (CS) over a six-month period (1/4/22 to 31/9/22). Result(s): 20 women met inclusion criteria (Category 1-3 CS - 12 women;Category 4 CS - 8 women). 100% of patients had booking height, weight and BMI recorded. 20% (4/20) of patients were reweighed in the 3rd trimester. Only 55% (11/20) of patients had been referred to and reviewed in the antenatal obstetric anaesthetic clinic (Figure). Of the 11 patients referred, 6 were referred later than 30 weeks. Of the 9 patients not referred, 8 had a BMI between 40 and 45 kg/m2. By contrast, 87% (6/7) of patients with BMI over 45 kg/m2 were referred and seen. Discussion(s): Our audit showed that we are not meeting national standards. Possible reasons identified were lack of awareness of the RCOG standards and referral criteria (especially for women with a BMI of 40 to 45 kg/m2) and logistical issues in undertaking face-to-face reviews without designated clinic space. Presentation of our results at the joint anaesthetic, obstetric and midwifery governance meeting has helped identify space in the antenatal clinic for face-to-face reviews, to start from March 2023 and to raise awareness of the national standards to ensure referral of all women with a BMI over 40 kg/m2. A reaudit is planned in 6 months. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Perinatal admissions to Critical Care are increasing due to rising maternal age, obesity, and comorbid disease.1 The MBRRACE Report 2021 stated that of 191 maternal deaths in 2017-2019, only 17% had good care.2 Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a subjective increase in perinatal admissions to Mid Yorkshire Hospitals Critical Care. Objective(s): To investigate whether MYH Critical Care maternal admissions have increased, if there has been a change in admission trends and to evaluate the care of critically ill pregnant and postpartum women compared to FICM standards.3 Methods: Retrospective audit of notes of all pregnant and up to 6 weeks postpartum women admitted to critical care between 24/02/2019 and 05/09/2021. Data collected included gestation, duration of admission, organ support, days reviewed by obstetrics and mortality outcomes. Result(s): * There was 1 maternal death and 3 fetal deaths during the study period * 50% of the admissions were antenatal and 50% were postnatal * During the COVID-19 pandemic we have seen a 47% increased rate of admissions from 1 per 29 critical care bed days to 1 per 19 critical care bed days * 50% of patients were supported with ventilation and CPAP during admission, 13% with CPAP only. Prior to the COVID pandemic, no maternal admission required CPAP on our Critical Care unit during the data collection period * 63% of patients were reviewed by obstetrics at least one during their admission, but obstetric review was documented on only 37 of 112 patient days * There is no critical care SOP for perimortem Caesarean section * There is no specialist neonatal resuscitation equipment available on ICU * There is no named ICM consultant responsible for Maternal Critical Care * There is no SOP for support of maternal contact with baby * There is no critical care/obstetric services MDT follow-up Conclusion(s): This study shows that Critical Care admissions have increased, and that care does not follow all the FICM recommendations. Considering this, the following recommendations have been made: * Introduce an SOP and simulation training for peri-mortem section * Introduce neonatal resuscitation equipment box * Nomination of a named ICM Consultant lead for Maternal Critical Care to ensure quality of care and act as liaison * Train critical care staff in supporting contact between a mother and baby, with support from midwifery services * Introduction of Obstetric and Critical Care MDT follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Objective This S2k guideline of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Society of Perinatal Medicine (DGPM) contains consensus-based recommendations for the care and treatment of pregnant women, parturient women, women who have recently given birth, and breastfeeding women with SARS-CoV-2 infection and their newborn infants. The aim of the guideline is to provide recommendations for action in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic for professionals caring for the above-listed groups of people. Methods The PICO format was used to develop specific questions. A systematic targeted search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, and previously formulated statements and recommendations issued by the DGGG and the DGPM were used to summarize the evidence. This guideline also drew on research data from the CRONOS registry. As the data basis was insufficient for a purely evidence-based guideline, the guideline was compiled using an S2k-level consensus-based process. After summarizing and presenting the available data, the guideline authors drafted recommendations in response to the formulated PICO questions, which were then discussed and voted on. Recommendations Recommendations on hygiene measures, prevention measures and care during pregnancy, delivery, the puerperium and while breastfeeding were prepared. They also included aspects relating to the monitoring of mother and child during and after infection with COVID-19, indications for thrombosis prophylaxis, caring for women with COVID-19 while they are giving birth, the presence of birth companions, postnatal care, and testing and monitoring the neonate during rooming-in or on the pediatric ward.Copyright © 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background. The Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) in Indonesia is still a health problem that must be solved. In 2018 and 2019, the postpartum period still dominates maternal mortality in Surabaya. The postpartum visit method is one of the essential things that can affect postpartum services, so it is necessary to evaluate the implementation of the postpartum visit method and recommend visiting methods to improve maternal health. Objective.The study explores the implementation and recommendation of postpartum visit methods during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Materials and Methods. It used a qualitative research type by assessing the interview and observation dept. The instruments used are questionnaires and observation sheets. Researchers conducted interviews with 14 mothers who had completed the postpartum period, five midwives, a stakeholder in the health office and two experts in the field of maternal health. The data is processed using organizing, reduction, coding, description, linking between themes, and data interpretation. Results. Offline visits to health facilities still dominate the implementation of the postpartum visit method. The recommended postpartum visit method combines visits to health facilities, home visits, and telehealth. Besides that, it is necessary to consider maternal postpartum services up to 3 months after delivery, especially for postpartum mothers who have problems. Conclusion. The postpartum visit method during the COVID-19 pandemic, has not run optimally because there are restrictions on offline visits. However, it has not been supported by online monitoring or home visits.Copyright © the Author(s), 2023.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and in order to maintain essential operations in a socially distanced environment, many services in healthcare have undergone significant change, moving towards telemedicine solutions. This has ranged from virtual GP consultations to virtual examinations for post-graduate students. Telemedicine solutions are unlikely to provide a wholesale replacement for face-to-face patient interaction without significant deficiencies, however, they do herald new hybrid ways of working, allowing service providers to reach clients where they are. Anaesthetic followup for Obstetric clients who have undergone an anaesthetic intervention is a national recommendation by RCOA [1] and AAGBI/OAA [2]. The aim of this QI project was to launch a digital follow-up survey for Obstetric clients who underwent an anaesthetic intervention which could be utilised in a busy unit where staff shortage or high clinical workload often preclude daily face-to-face follow up. Method(s): We created a digital clients survey which is accessed by scanning a QR code. With the support of senior midwifery coordinators, large posters advertising the survey and QR code were put up in each client bay on the post-natal ward and flyers with QR codes were given to clients. Midwives reminded post-natal clients to complete the survey. We included a flyer with the QR code in discharge paperwork. The survey included an option to request a face-to face anaesthetic review. Result(s): During the trial period of three weeks, 87 inpatient and discharged post-natal clients responded via the digital follow-up tool. Discussion(s): Digital follow-up can provide an invaluable supplemental source of follow-up, supporting conventional follow-up methods and facilitating safe fast-track discharge. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
ABSTRACT
Midwives are the front-line workers providing maternity care for women in many countries. The role of the midwife includes providing information about, and recommendations for, maternal vaccination in pregnancy and for the baby in the postnatal period. Vaccinations recommended in pregnancy include those to prevent influenza, pertussis, tetanus and now COVID-19. Vaccinations for the newborn baby include hepatitis B. Healthcare professionals play an important role in influencing decision-making around vaccination and midwives are key in supporting vaccination uptake. Midwives are strong influencer in women's decisions around vaccination for themselves and their babies. The COVID-19 vaccination programs have shone a light on vaccination in pregnancy especially as SARS-COV-2 infection has significant adverse effects in pregnancy. COVID-19 vaccination has been shown to be safe and effective in pregnancy. Despite this, there is vaccine hesitancy from pregnant women in many countries. Midwives play a unique role in the provision of care to women and families but they need specific support and information regarding vaccination in pregnancy. Targeted education, supportive mentoring and supervision and opportunities to lead innovative ways of ensuring vaccine access is logistically easy and possible are all needed. This Commentary outlines the key vaccinations recommended in pregnancy including COVID-19 vaccination and highlights some strategies to scale-up vaccination programs in pregnancy with a particular focus on the role of midwives.
ABSTRACT
According to the World Health Organization, midwife-led care is the most appropriate and cost-effective type of perinatal care. As the Covid-19 pandemic with its drastic changes and challenges for the health systems and the medical staff made large adjustments to the healthcare delivery system, midwife-led care became an even more important supportive tool in maintaining unnecessary interventions. This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the outcomes of midwife-led care and team-led care in low-risk births between the Covid-19 pandemic and non-Covid-19 pandemic period. The total studied population was 1,185 singleton births and consisted of 727 births during the non-Covid-19 period and 458 births from the Covid-19 period. The study revealed the safety of low-risk birth care during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in both groups. The maternal and perinatal outcomes remained stable without an increased rate of unsuccessful vaginal births and newborn asphyxia; moreover, birth care of low-risk women provided by midwives preserved autonomy, integrity, and resistance to responding to a disaster. The aforementioned results exhibit that high-quality, safe supervision by midwives in low-risk births can be provided even in high-stress circumstances.
ABSTRACT
Background: Providing care for patients with Diabetes in Pregnancy (DiP) provides unique challenges beyond those faced in standard antenatal care, or diabetes outside of pregnancy. Teleclinics (use of telephone, email, or other technologies) as an alternative to in-person clinic appointments have become more widely used for care since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. To understand how teleclinics might be improved for ongoing use, it is important to understand the experiences and perceptions of the clinicians involved in DiP care. Method(s): A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of healthcare providers in a large DiP service. Twenty staff members (midwifery, obstetrics, physician, dietician, and administration) were approached to participate. Fifteen staff across 5 specialties consented to be interviewed. Template analysis of interview transcripts was performed, with a focus on 3 themes: collaboration and working together are important for providing DiP care;the need for flexibility in scheduling and the ability to individualise the way care is provided;challenges to adapting to new technology. Result(s): Potential benefits of teleclinics were acknowledged, but respondents also viewed teleclinics as not suitable for all DiP patients due to different needs and risks. Challenges to using teleclinics include establishing good rapport and the limited current infrastructure and patient resources. Conclusion(s): Healthcare providers viewed teleclinics as a way of supporting rather than replacing current care. Maintaining flexibility in clinic scheduling to allow incorporating teleclinics into patient's current schedule of visits ad hoc and providing extra technical and administrative support are important considerations for developing a teleclinic service.
ABSTRACT
Importance: Women with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (ICBPS) face isolation and treatment challenges. Group medical visits using Centering models have successfully treated other conditions but have not been explored in ICBPS. Objective(s): This study aimed to describe ICBPS pain and symptom control comparing standard treatment alone versus standard treatment augmented with Centering visits. Study Design: This prospective cohort study recruited women with ICBPS receiving standard care (control) or standard care augmented with group Centering. We administered validated questionnaires at baseline and monthly for 12 months. The primary outcome was change in the pain numerical rating scale, with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Scale and Bladder Pain/Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score change as secondary measures. Result(s): We enrolled 45 women (20 Centering, 25 controls). Centering had significantly better numerical rating scale pain scores at 1 month (mean difference [diff], -3.45) and 2 months (mean diff, -3.58), better Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Scale scores at 1 month (mean diff, -10.62) and 2 months (mean diff, -9.63), and better Bladder Pain/Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score scores at 2 months (mean diff, -13.19), and 3 months (mean diff, -12.3) compared with controls. In modeling, treatment group (Centering or control) and educational levels were both associated with all the outcomes of interest. Beyond 6 months, there were too few participants for meaningful analyses. Conclusion(s): Women with ICBPS participating in a Centering group have, in the short term, less pain, pain interference, and ICBPS-specific symptoms than patients with usual care alone. Larger studies with more follow-up are needed to determine if this treatment effect extends over time.Copyright © 2022 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Australia, maternity care services provide care for pregnant and postpartum women and their newborns. The COVID-19 pandemic forced these services to quickly adapt and develop policies and procedures for dealing with transmission in health care facilities, as well as work under public health measures to counter its spread within the community. Despite well-documented responses and adaptations by healthcare systems, no studies have examined the experiences of maternity service leaders through the pandemic. This study aimed to explore the experiences of maternity service leaders, to understand their perspectives on what happened in health services and what was required of a leader during the COVID-19 pandemic in one Australian state. METHODS: A longitudinal qualitative study collected data from 11 maternity care leaders during the pandemic in the state of Victoria. Leaders participated in a series of interviews over the 16-month study period, with a total of 57 interviews conducted. An inductive approach to developing codes allowed for semantic coding of the data, then a thematic analysis was conducted to explore patterned meaning across the dataset. RESULTS: One overarching theme, 'challenges of being a maternity service leader during the pandemic', encompassed participant's experiences. Four sub-themes described the experiences of these leaders: (1) needing to be a rapid decision-maker, (2) needing to adapt and alter services, (3) needing to filter and translate information, and (4) the need to support people. At the beginning of the pandemic, the challenges were most acute with slow guideline development, rapid communications from the government and an urgent need to keep patients and staff safe. Over time, with knowledge and experience, leaders were able to quickly adjust and respond to policy change. CONCLUSION: Maternity service leaders played an important role in preparing and adapting services in accordance with government directives and guidelines while also developing strategies tailored to their own health service requirements. These experiences will be invaluable in designing high quality and responsive systems for maternity care in future crises.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Maternal Health Services , Infant, Newborn , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Pandemics , Delivery of Health Care , Victoria , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
Objectives: Good sleep quality is crucial for medical staff especially nurses and midwives to prevent possible errors and injuries during the providing care. The aim here is to investigate the sleep quality of nurses and midwives during the early corona pandemic and its related factors. Methods: An online observational and cross-sectional study included 340 medical staff who engaged in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 infection in 2020. Participants completed questionnaires about working characteristics, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Social Support Indexes (SSI). Pearson's correlation analysis and Multivariate logistic regression identified the interactions between these factors. Results: The mean PSQI and SSI were 8.4 ± 4.46 and 28.6 ± 13.29, respectively, indicating poor sleep quality and moderate social support. The condition of the participants was serious in terms of sleep efficiency, and sleep disturbance. More than half of the participants reported severe and very serious daytime dysfunction. Poor sleep quality was more common, in nurses than in midwives (OR:0.074, CI; 0.032-0.098, P < 0.001), nurses working in intensive care units than in other wards (OR:1.082, CI; 1.003-4.023, P = 0.005), in people who had long shifts (OR:1.757, CI; 1.123-4.323, P = 0.003), and in people working more than 5 years (OR:4.949, CI; 1.673-6.023, P = 0.028). Social support has a statistically significant relationship with the quality of sleep (OR:0.013, CI; 0.001-0.244, P = 0.004). Conclusion: The sleep quality of the medical staff has been impaired during the epidemic period, especially among nurses. Targeting staff who are more prone to sleep disturbance, such as nurses with longer work experience, helps us design an optimal strategy to support them through sleep hygiene education.
ABSTRACT
Objective. Neurohormonal processes control both the physiological aspects of labor and childbirth, and contribute to the subjective psychological experiences of birth. This concept has always been underestimated in clinical practice and this became even more glaring during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study was to analyze through the experience of midwives, how they, during the pandemic, have contributed to influence and maintain the balance of the psycho-neuro-endocrine axis (PNEI). Materials and Methods. A qualitative research study, based on the phenomenological method of Cohen on a sample of midwives from the A.O.U.I Policlinico of Bari, interviewed in September 2021. Results. Four main themes emerged from the analysis of the interviews and field notes: ''Woman Care'', ''Loneliness and Fear'', ''Mask and DPI'', and finally ''COVID and Contagion''. In addition, eleven subthemes were derived from these as can be seen in the table (Table 1). The results of the analysis showed how midwives, who have always been the main reference figures for women, newborns and couples, have worked tirelessly to ensure that women received the best possible care, covid positive or not, aware of the influence that the psycho-physical component has on the hormonal release that guides the course of the birth event. Conclusions. As the pandemic continues, there is an urgent need to improve the care and promote a physiological birth since it is known that giving birth physiologically is a psychologically powerful experience. From this emerges the need for health care providers to become aware of the importance of maintaining the psychoneuroendocrine balance to allow women to have the most positive birth experience possible.
ABSTRACT
Clinicians today have never, perhaps, been more aware of the utmost importance of handwashing prior to clinical examination and surgery. However, in the 1800s this was not the case. The simple act of handwashing was once ridiculed and debated with considerable controversy within the medical profession. It was obstetrician Ignaz Semmelweis (1818-1865) who put forward its importance, and thereafter Joseph Lister who, in 1864, developed antiseptic techniques in surgery, following on from Pasteur and Koch's work on germ theory. In 1846, Dr Semmelweis was working in Vienna, responsible for the first division of maternity services. He noticed the striking difference in mortality rate in women who had deliveries by doctors and medical students, compared with deliveries by midwives. This mortality was known as puerperal fever or childbed fever. He hypothesized that doctors and medical students were transferring 'cadaverous particles' as they handled cadavers during autopsies, and then went on to examine pregnant women. The mortality rate was lower when midwives, who did not handle cadavers, performed deliveries. Thereafter, he initiated mandatory handwashing for all those delivering babies, using chloride of lime solution. The mortality rate reduced significantly after the implementation of handwashing and the washing of medical instruments. However, Semmelweis's hypothesis was not supported by many in the medical profession, and most senior academics questioned and disregarded his conclusions. He subsequently returned to Budapest where he continued to work and undertake handwashing. He published 'The etiology, concept, and prophylaxis of childbed fever' in 1861, but it was deemed a laborious read and was poorly received. Unfortunately, reports indicate that Semmelweis's behaviour and actions deteriorated, some speculated due to early-onset dementia or syphilis. He was admitted to a Viennese psychiatric hospital and died in 1865 aged 47 years. Ironically, given his passion for hygiene, he died from sepsis due to a wound infection. Semmelweis has been acknowledged with a university hospital and museum named after him, as well as a postage stamp, issued in Austria in 1965 on the 100th anniversary of his death. Many lessons have been learned from Semmelweis. The medical establishment was slow to adopt his advice. Handwashing effectively reduces healthcare-associated infections, and clinician adherence to hand hygiene advice has increased since the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. The World Health Organization's 'My 5 moments for hand hygiene' is known worldwide, with its most recent caption (2021) 'Seconds save lives - clean your hands'.
ABSTRACT
Background: Correct use of personal protective equipment is vital to minimise the risk of patients acquiring healthcare-associated infections. These measures are also important in preventing exposure to occupational infection. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of personal protective equipment was associated with anxiety, uncertainty and additional training requirements. This study investigated midwives' experiences using personal protective equipment during the pandemic. Methods: This systematic scoping review searched seven academic databases and grey literature. Data analysis was conducted using a thematic analysis framework. Results: A total of 16 studies were included. Four themes were found: 'fear and anxiety', 'personal protective equipment/resources', 'education and training needs' and 'communication'. Conclusions: Management and administration inconsistences, logistical issues and lack of training on personal protective equipment led to midwives' negative feedback. A gap has been identified in the exploration of midwives' experiences as personal protective equipment end-users during the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Objective. To analyse, through the experience of the women interviewed, the impact that the migratory experience has had on them in the context of pregnancy and childbirth, and the quality of the obstetric care received during labor and childbirth. Materials and Methods. For this study, a qualitative methodology was adopted known as Cohen's phenomenology. The study was conducted in the period between January 2022 - March 2022 recruiting a sample of 11 immigrant women at the Policlinico of Bari and the Societa Cooperativa Sociale OASI 2 San Francesco Onlus. Results. From the analysis of the interviews, five main themes emerged: Migration, Memory, Assistance to immigrant women, The language barrier, Loneliness. The stories uncovered the basic needs that bring every woman together during pregnancy and childbirth and the cultural aspects, bringing out the impact of migratory trauma. The women reported that they had received good obstetric care, defining the image of a midwife as the one who stands beside. However, several difficulties emerged, from the language barrier to loneliness, burdened by the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions. It emerged from the interviews that the preparation of the midwife in the transcultural field is essential in order to be able to provide appropriate and personalized assistance. The goal of health workers is to create a mental attitude of openness towards confrontation and knowledge, and suspension from judgment. It is important to approach the life of immigrant women and tear down barriers, embracing the possibility of other narratives of body, health and disease.
ABSTRACT
Objective. The aim of the study was to intercept early problems and difficulties in onset and stabilization phases of breastfeeding, in a population of healthy full-term newborns - during the COVID-19 pandemic - through a Clinical Governance Project, supported by the Department of Neonatology and Pediatrics, which introduced a speech therapist, as part of the professional team acting synergistically with neonatologists, pediatricians, pediatric nurses, midwives and gynecologists. Materials and Methods. Over a period of two months (2020), n = 72 newborns, 38 males and 34 females, were recruited (mean age:1.3 days) in the Departments of Neonatology and Obstetrics and Gynecology of Castelli Hospital, ASLRM6. Lingual frenulum neonatal screening (Martinelli, 2015) was administered to all the newborns and the frenulum was classified as normal, doubtful or impaired. Breastfeeding difficulties were evaluated and speech therapist counseling was performed, to support early onset and stabilization of breastfeeding. Results. Lingual frenulum screening resulted normal in 36 (50%), doubtful in 20 (28%) and impaired in 16 (22%) of total newborns. An alteration of both lingual and upper labial frenulum was found in 16 (22%) of the newborns studied. n = 23 newborns (32%) showed alterations able to hinder breastfeeding: these cases were successfully managed by helping the mothers to change the breastfeeding position, adopting a rugby hold position. Conclusions. According to our preliminary results, speech therapist counselling, in the critical COVID-19 pandemic, allowed early detection of lingual frenulum alterations, and their impact on the onset of breastfeeding. We found that altered lingual frenulum was associated with breastfeeding difficulties: in these patients, speech therapist intervention resulted useful in managing early breastfeeding problems.
ABSTRACT
The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in 2019 was met with various responses globally in an effort to reduce its spread. Despite these efforts, however, low- and middle-income countries like Indonesia are still being confronted with challenges, especially the healthcare providers who are frontline workers in the struggle. The current study aimed to explore the support expected by and provided to Indonesian midwives and pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research method used was a descriptive-interpretative qualitative research design. The data was collected through conducting in-depth interviews with 24 midwives who were purposively sampled and evenly recruited across all regions and all areas of midwifery practice in Indonesia. The recorded interviews were coded and themes were identified, after which a thematic analysis was done. Two main themes emerged and nine sub-themes were identified from the main themes. The study findings offered new insights into the individual and collective experiences of midwives from various regions in Indonesia. They had to adjust by leveraging the internet and mobile telephones in order to continue delivering standard care to pregnant women amid the pandemic. In addition, the midwives saw the need to provide food and financial support to pregnant women. However, despite the end of the pandemic being in sight in September 2022, there is a need to continue to support midwives and pregnant women in the disruption caused by the pandemic. Government agencies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) should plan interventions targeted at providing specific support to midwives and pregnant women. © Unisa Press 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background: Evidence reveals that COVID-19, in addition to impacting the respiratory system, affects other organs, including the male and female reproductive systems. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of COVID-19 on the human reproductive system. Method(s): Data were collected in SID, Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. The Keywords including COVID- 19, reproductive system, fertility, and factors related to mesh term utilization and Boolean strategy were used. Papers from 2019 to 2022 were extracted. Finally, out of 58 searched articles, 20 articles related to the purpose of the study were reviewed. Result(s): The results were organized into two categories. The first category deals with the effect of COVID-19 on the female reproductive system including Sleep disorders following quarantine on gonadotropin release and its effect on the ovaries and menstrual cycle, preterm delivery, increased cesarean delivery, the possibility of intrauterine infection of the fetus and dysfunction of the reproductive glands. The second category concerns the effect of COVID-19 on the male reproductive system including abnormal semen quality, possible effect on gonocyte differentiation in the early stages of spermatogenesis, negative effect on spermatogenesis, testicular dysfunction, and changes in testosterone concentration by increasing serum LH, testicular inflammation, decreased sperm concentration in semen, impaired sperm motility, dysfunction of the reproductive glands, significant damage to the seminiferous tube, swelling of Sertoli cells, decreased Leydig cells, significant disorder on semen volume and impaired sperm morphology. Conclusion(s): The findings revealed that COVID-19 has an impact on various aspects of the human reproductive system. Midwives and gynecologists should alleviate couples' fears about infertility by recognizing these cases and offering suitable counseling to couples infected with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 outbreak, which was first reported in December 2019, has affected the whole world. The first case in Turkey was confirmed on March11, 2020. Healthcare workers fight at the frontline against this virus with intense infectivity and are the occupational group under the highest risk. 7.428 health workers were infected in Turkey in late April 2020. Anxiety levels of healthcare workers have increased due to this high risk exposure. The aim of this study is to examine the attitudes of healthcare workers towards COVID-19 and the affecting factors. The study is cross-sectional. The study population consists of the healthcare workers working in the province of Samsun (N = 11926). The sample size of the study was determined as 370 people within the 5% margin of error and 95% confidence interval. The study data were collected between April 1, 2020 and April 30, 2020. Questionnaires were used as a data collection tool in the study. The questionnaire consists of two parts. The first part includes descriptive questions to determine individual characteristics. The second part is the covid attitude survey created by reviewing the literature. Descriptive statistics, Student's t test and One-Way Anova were used to evaluate the data. The age distribution of the participants is 34.81 +/- 8.54. In the study, it was determined that gender, marital status, title, working year, having children or not, chronic disease status, and health and life satisfaction were the factors affecting the attitude towards Covid-19 (p <0.05). It was ascertained that the COVID-19 attitudes of women, those who were still married, midwives, those who had been working for 11-20 years, those with children, those with chronic diseases, and those with a poor health perception and life quality were more negative compared to others. COVID-19 causes especially healthcare workers to become concerned both for themselves and their relatives since it is an unrecognized infection and easily transmitted. It might be important to follow different strategies particularly for healthcare workers who are married, have children and have health problems.Copyright © 2020 Necati Ozpinar. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The increased incidence of hand dermatitis (HD) is well documented in healthcare professionals (HCPs) (Flyvholm MA, Bach B, Rose M, Jepsen KF. Self-reported hand eczema in a hospital population. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57: 110-15). It is reported that HD accounts for 95% of all occupational dermatitis (Bains SN, Nash P, Fonacier L. Irritant contact dermatitis. Clinic Rev Allergy Immunol 2019;56: 99-109). We sought to better understand the prevalence of HD in HCPs in a large teaching hospital, identify any associated risk factors and assess their knowledge of hand care. Additionally, we aimed to assess the availability of ward facilities and posters for hand hygiene and hand care. The survey was conducted between November 2015 and January 2016. A review of ward facilities and posters for hand care and hand hygiene was conducted in October 2020. A total of 820 HCPs responded to the survey. Altogether, 444 respondents (54 1%) reported a previous history of HD and 226 (27 6%) reported active dermatitis. These included 153 (18 6%) doctors/ dentists, 76 (9 3%) allied health professionals (AHPs), 46 (5 6%) nurses/midwives, 27 (3 3%) administrative staff, 16 (1 9%) other, five (0 6%) technicians and 108 (13 2%) medical/ dental/nursing/midwifery/AHP students. Only 10 (1 2%) took time off work owing to their HD, with five (0 6%) requiring > 5 days off work, but 67 (8 2%) wished they had taken time off work. In total, 416 (50 7%) respondents washed their hands > 20 times daily and 229 (27 9%) used disinfectants > 20 times per day. Those with a prior history of atopic dermatitis (AD) were at higher risk of developing HD [relative risk (RR) 1 69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1 52-1 89;P < 0 001], and within 6 months of starting their job/placement (RR 1 82, 95% CI 1 3-2 5;P < 0 002). Only 107 (13 0%) respondents were able to identify all 11 correct statements regarding hand care. Two hundred and twenty (49 5%) of the 444 HCPs with a history of HD never received hand care advice when they started their current role. The 24 adult wards surveyed had a total of 162 general-use sinks, all with hand soap and disinfectant, and 154 hand hygiene posters. In contrast, only 22 sinks had emollients available. No posters were seen regarding hand care and skin health. This survey highlights the high prevalence of HD among HCPs, especially those with AD, but many are still not aware of good hand care measures. Additionally, our survey reflects the need for early education and equal facilities for hand care and hand hygiene, as both are important when delivering good clinical care, to protect patients and staff, especially in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.